LEADER 00000cam  2200553Ii 4500 
001    ocn951022954 
003    OCoLC 
005    20170927053057.6 
006    m     o  d         
007    cr ||||||||||| 
008    160602t20162016caud    ob    000 0 eng d 
020    9780833095794|q(electronic bk.) 
020    083309579X|q(electronic bk.) 
035    (OCoLC)951022954 
037    22573/ctt1d43fs0|bJSTOR 
040    DOS|beng|erda|epn|cDOS|dOCLCO|dBTCTA|dJSTOR|dYDXCP|dOCLCO
       |dCOO|dWNC|dOCLCQ 
043    n-us--- 
049    CKEA 
050  4 UA23.3|b.C66 2016eb online 
082 04 355.6/220973|223 
100 1  Connor, Kathryn,|eauthor. 
245 10 Sustaining Service Members and Their Families :|bExploring
       Opportunities for Efficiency and Joint Provision of 
       Services Using Nonappropriated Funds /|cKathryn Connor, 
       Carra S. Sims, Rianne Laureijs, Jaime Hastings, Kristin 
       Van Abel, Kayla M. Williams, Michael Schwille. 
246 3  Exploring Opportunities for Efficiency and Joint Provision
       of Services Using Nonappropriated Funds 
264  1 Santa Monica, Calif. :|bRAND,|c[2016] 
264  4 |c©2016 
300    1 online resource (xxii, 102 pages) :|bcolor charts. 
336    text|btxt|2rdacontent 
337    computer|bc|2rdamedia 
338    online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 
490 1  Research report ;|vRR-1175-OSD 
500    "May 31, 2016"--Table of contents page. 
504    Includes bibliographical references (pages 97-102). 
505 00 |tPreface --|tFigures and Tables --|tSummary --
       |tAcknowledgments --|tAbbreviations --|g. 1.|tIntroduction
       :|tStudy Purpose and Focus --|tOrganization of the Report 
       --|g2.|tProgram Area Descriptions: NAF Accounting and NAF 
       Employee Benefits:|tNAF Accounting --|tNAF Employee 
       Benefits --|g3.|tEight Guidelines for Managing Change: 
       Insight from Expert Literature and Case Studies:
       |tOrganizational Change Literature --|tEight Guidelines 
       for Organizational Change --|tCase Studies Demonstrating 
       Eight Change-Management Guidelines --|tLessons Learned 
       from Case Studies --|g4.|tManaging Change: Analysis and 
       Ways Forward for NAF Accounting and NAF Employee Benefits:
       |tApplying the Eight Guidelines: NAF Accounting --
       |tApplying the Eight Guidelines: NAF Employee Benefits --
       |g5.|tNAF Accounting Consolidation: Cost Analysis and 
       Results:|tNAF Accounting: Goals and Courses of Action --
       |tApproach to Cost Estimation --|tData Collection --
       |tMethodology --|tAnalysis --|tResults: Costs and Savings 
       for NAF Accounting RIE Courses of Action --|g6.|tNAF 
       Employee Benefits Efficiency: Cost Analysis and Results:
       |tNAF Employee Benefits: Setting Coordination Goals --
       |tApproach to Cost Estimation --|tData Sources --
       |tMethodology --|tResults of Cost Estimation for NAF 
       Employee Benefits RIE Recommendations --|tTotal Costs for 
       NAF Employee Benefits RIE Recommendations --|g7.
       |tConclusions and Recommendations:|tAccounting --
       |tBenefits|tRecommendations --|tAPPENDIXES:|gA.
       |tSemistructured Discussion Guide --|gB.|tNAF Employee 
       Benefits Data Gathering --|gC.|tBackground Information for
       Case Studies --|gD.|tNAF Accounting Cost Detail --
       |tReferences. 
520    "The Department of Defense (DoD) routinely seeks ways to 
       become more efficient and reduce costs. Each military 
       service provides its members and their families with a 
       wide range of services supported by resources that are 
       paid for using congressionally appropriated funding (APF),
       nonappropriated funding (NAF), or a combination thereof. 
       DoD was interested in determining whether any 
       administrative NAF activities could be consolidated -- and,
       if so, whether consolidation would save costs. DoD created
       a task force to explore these issues and identified 
       several areas for improvement, ranging from contracting to
       information technology. DoD Military Community and Family 
       Policy asked the RAND National Defense Research Institute 
       to review the work of the task force and provide an 
       independent assessment of specific recommendations. In 
       collaboration with the sponsor, RAND provided intensive 
       analysis of recommendations in two areas for improvement 
       that the task force identified. Researchers determined 
       that application of consolidation could achieve 
       improvement and savings in some NAF accounting activities,
       but that there is considerably less potential in the case 
       of NAF employee benefits"--Publisher's description. 
588 0  Online resource; title from PDF title page (RAND, viewed 
       June 2, 2016). 
610 10 United States.|bDepartment of Defense|xAppropriations and 
       expenditures. 
610 10 United States.|bDepartment of Defense|xPersonnel 
       management. 
650  0 Soldiers|xServices for|xCosts. 
650  0 Families of military personnel|xServices for|xCosts. 
650  0 Organizational change|xManagement. 
650  7 POLITICAL SCIENCE|xInternational Relations|xTreaties.
       |2bisacsh 
651  0 United States|xArmed Forces|xCost effectiveness. 
710 2  National Defense Research Institute (U.S.),|epublisher,
       |eissuing body. 
830  0 Research report (Rand Corporation) ;|vRR-1175-OSD. 
914    ocn951022954 
994    92|bCKE