| Description |
1 online resource (x, 303 pages). |
| Series |
Contributions in military studies, 0883-6884 ; no. 210 |
|
Contributions in military studies ; no. 210.
0883-6884
|
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 265-283) and index. |
| Note |
Print version record. |
| Contents |
""Contents""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""CONSCRIPTION AND DEMOCRACY""; ""Chapter 1 Introduction""; ""Chapter 2 The Road to World War I""; ""Chapter 3 Conscription and War""; ""Chapter 4 1920 to 1945""; ""Chapter 5 Limited Wars""; ""Chapter 6 Operating the System""; ""Chapter 7 Deferring the Elite""; ""Chapter 8 Fit to Fight""; ""Chapter 9 Conscription and the Economy""; ""Chapter 10 Conscience and the Draft""; ""Chapter 11 The Politics of Conscription""; ""Chapter 12 Evaluation and Conclusions""; ""Selected Bibliography""; ""Index"" |
| Summary |
Annotation Finding the manpower to defend democracy has been a recurring problem. Russell Weigley writes: "The historic preoccupation of the Army's thought in peacetime has been the manpower question: how, in an unmilitary nation, to muster adequate numbers of capable soldiers quickly should war occur." When the nature of modern warfare made an all-volunteer army inadequate, the major Western democracies confronted the dilemma of involuntary military service in a free society. The core of this manuscript concerns methods by which France, Great Britain, and the United States solved the problem and why some solutions were more lasting and effective than others. Flynn challenges conventional wisdom that suggests that conscription was inefficient and that it promoted inequality of sacrifice. Sharing similar but not identical diplomatic outlooks, the three countries discussed here were allies in world wars and in the Cold War, and they also confronted the problem of using conscripts to defend colonial interests in an age of decolonization. These societies rest upon democratic principles, and operating a draft in a democracy raises several unique problems. A particular tension develops as a result of adopting forced military service in a polity based on concepts of individual rights and freedoms. Despite the protest and inconsistencies, the criticism and waste, Flynn reveals that conscription served the three Western democracies well in an historical context, proving effective in gathering fighting men and allowing a flexibility to cope and change as problems arose. |
| Subject |
Draft -- France -- History -- 20th century.
|
|
Draft -- Great Britain -- History -- 20th century.
|
|
Draft -- United States -- History -- 20th century.
|
|
TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING -- Military Science.
|
|
HISTORY -- Military -- Other.
|
|
Draft. (OCoLC)fst00897312
|
|
France. (OCoLC)fst01204289
|
|
Great Britain. (OCoLC)fst01204623
|
|
United States. (OCoLC)fst01204155
|
|
Militaire dienstplicht.
|
|
Democratie.
|
| Chronological Term |
1900 - 1999
|
| Genre/Form |
History. (OCoLC)fst01411628
|
| Other Form: |
Print version: Flynn, George Q. Conscription and democracy. Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 2002 (DLC) 2001023314 |
| ISBN |
9780313074196 (electronic bk.) |
|
0313074194 (electronic bk.) |
|
