LEADER 00000cam 2200661 i 4500 001 ocn894626407 003 OCoLC 005 20170927053355.7 006 m o d 007 cr cn||||||||| 008 140829s2012 enka obt 000 0 eng 016 7 101640337|2DNLM 019 847596904|a867483646 020 9780833079558 020 0833079557 027 RAND/TR-1213-EC 035 (OCoLC)894626407|z(OCoLC)847596904|z(OCoLC)867483646 037 22573/ctt36t6wd|bJSTOR 040 NLM|beng|erda|epn|cNLM|dRSM|dJSTOR|dOCLCF|dYDXCP|dTEF |dOCLCQ 042 pcc 043 e------ 049 CKEA 050 4 RA399.5|b.E9 2012 060 4 WT 500 082 04 362.1|223 100 1 Nolte, Ellen,|eauthor. 245 10 Evaluating chronic disease management :|brecommendations for funders and users /|cEllen Nolte [and 19 others] ; prepared for the European Commission on behalf of the DISMEVAL Consortium. 264 1 Santa Monica, CA :|bRAND Corporation,|c2012. 300 1 online resource (1 PDF file (xv, 85 pages)) : |billustrations. 336 text|btxt|2rdacontent 337 computer|bc|2rdamedia 338 online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 490 1 Technical report ;|vTR-1213-EC 500 Title from PDF title page. 504 Includes bibliographical references. 505 0 Introduction -- The context for evaluating chronic disease management -- Methods and metrics for evaluation: experiences from the DISMEVAL project -- Practical considerations for evaluation -- Challenges and lessons learned -- Going forward: Conclusions and further research -- Appendix A: Summary overview of six DISMEVAL work packages on disease management evaluation methods and metrics -- Appendix B: Evaluation measures for disease management (DM) interventions. 520 3 The report forms part of the DISMEVAL project, funded under the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme. It is targeted at policymakers, programme operators and researchers, explaining choices, options and trade-offs for the evaluation of disease management based on analyses undertaken within the project. Many of the issues discussed can be seen to apply to any evaluation of complex interventions in healthcare. However, there are specific concerns around evaluation design and metrics that are of relevance to the evaluation of disease management in particular and that are examined in the report. These include (i) the context for evaluating disease management, exploring the reasons for undertaking evaluation in the first place and explaining some of the underlying principles for doing so; (ii) the methods and metrics for evaluating disease management, focusing specifically on themes that have emerged as being pertinent to work carried out within the DISMEVAL project; (iii) practical considerations for disease management evaluation, based on experience of work undertaken in DISMEVAL; and (v) the broader challenges and lessons learned that may be relevant for policymakers, funders and practitioners interested in the use and usefulness of disease management evaluation more generally. This publication provides a major resource to guide the evaluation of disease management interventions in European settings and so contributes to strengthening the evidence- base required to inform the selection of efficient and effective interventions to address the growing burden of chronic disease in Europe. 538 Mode of access: internet via WWW.|5CStmoR 588 0 Version viewed Oct. 20, 2014. 610 20 DISMEVAL Project. 650 0 Disease management|zEurope. 650 7 Disease management.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00895152 650 12 Chronic Disease|xeconomics. 650 12 Chronic Disease|xtherapy. 650 22 Cost of Illness. 650 22 Evidence-Based Medicine. 650 22 Treatment Outcome. 651 7 Europe.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01245064 655 2 Evaluation Studies. 655 2 Technical Report. 710 2 RAND Europe,|eissuing body. 710 2 DISMEVAL Consortium,|eissuing body. 830 0 Technical report (Rand Corporation) ;|vTR-1213-EC. 914 ocn894626407 994 92|bCKE
|