Your session will expire automatically in 0 seconds.
LEADER 00000cam 22007094a 4500
001 ocn171258227
003 OCoLC
005 20150128123244.0
008 070907s2008 enkcf b 001 0 eng
010 2007036920
016 7 101315969|2DNLM
020 9780195188585|q(cloth:|qalkaline paper)
020 0195188586|q(cloth:|qalkaline paper)
035 (OCoLC)171258227
040 DNLM/DLC|beng|cDLC|dNLM|dBTCTA|dBAKER|dYDXCP|dC#P|dVRC|dVP
@|dCHVBK|dOCLCQ|dZWZ|dA7U|dSTF|dOCLCQ|dIG#|dOCLCF|dSTJ
042 pcc
043 n-us---
049 STJJ
050 00 HQ766.5.U5|bD69 2008
060 00 2008 E-204
060 10 WP 11.1|bD744s 2008
082 00 304.6/66|222
092 363.92|bD744S
100 1 Dowbiggin, Ian Robert,|d1952-
245 14 The sterilization movement and global fertility in the
twentieth century /|cIan Dowbiggin.
264 1 Oxford ;|aNew York :|bOxford University Press,|c2008.
300 262 pages, 8 unnumbered pages of plates :|bportraits ;|c25
cm
336 text|btxt|2rdacontent
337 unmediated|bn|2rdamedia
338 volume|bnc|2rdacarrier
504 Includes bibliographical references (pages 235-240) and
index.
505 0 Up from eugenics -- A new league -- The poverty bomb --
House on fire -- A great wave -- Tarred and feathered --
Going global.
520 1 "Next to global warming, the most urgent international
issue facing governments in the twenty-first century is
likely to be the all-time low birth rates around the world,
what pundits Ben Wattenberg and Philip Longman call the
"birth dearth" and the "empty cradle," respectively." "Now,
for the first time, historian Ian Dowbiggin explains that
a major cause of the birth dearth was the propagandistic
efforts of a handful of men and women, including Margaret
Sanger, Alan Guttmacher, and Paul Ehrlich, who in the
course of the twentieth century convinced policy makers
and the public that sterilization was the best means of
population control. Drawing on archival records, some
rarely seen before, Dowbiggin charts the rise of the
sterilization movement from its modest origins immediately
following World War II to its current status as one of the
most influential players in the international family-
planning field. Along the way, he documents how family-
planning programs based on sterilization targeted poverty-
stricken areas around the world. The result, Dowbiggin
argues, not only penalized the poor and minorities: it
also appears to be one of the biggest policy mistakes in
modern history. The author ends by shedding light on the
practical and ethical difficulties of distinguishing
coercion from choice in reproductive-health policy. What
does informed consent in birth control really mean on the
ground? Whose needs are actually served in attempts to
reduce fertility rates? According to Dowbiggin, the
twentieth-century birth control movement never entirely
shed its eugenic origins."--Jacket.
648 7 Geschichte 1900-1999|2swd
648 7 1900 - 1999|2fast
650 0 Sterilization (Birth control)|zUnited States|xHistory
|y20th century.
650 7 Geburtenrückgang|yGeschichte 20. Jh.|2idsbb
650 7 Geburtenregelung|yGeschichte 20. Jh.|2idsbb
650 7 Sterilisation|x(Unfruchtbarmachung)|yGeschichte 20. Jh.
|2idsbb
650 7 Geburtenregelung.|2idszbz
650 7 Sterilisation (Unfruchtbarmachung)|2idszbz
650 7 Fruchtbarkeit.|2idszbz
650 7 Sterilisation.|2swd
650 7 Geburtenentwicklung.|2swd
650 7 Fertilität.|2swd
650 7 Sterilization (Birth control)|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01133207
650 12 Sterilization, Reproductive|xhistory.
650 22 History, 20th Century.
650 22 Contraception Behavior|xhistory.
650 22 Socioeconomic Factors.
651 7 United States.|2idszbz
651 7 United States.|2swd
651 7 United States.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01204155
655 7 History.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01411628
776 08 |iOnline version:|aDowbiggin, Ian Robert, 1952-
|tSterilization movement and global fertility in the
twentieth century.|dOxford ; New York : Oxford University
Press, 2008|w(OCoLC)608623996
856 41 |3Table of contents|uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/
ecip0727/2007036920.html
994 01|bSTJ
Location
Call No.
Status
University of Saint Joseph: Pope Pius XII Library - Standard Shelving Location