LEADER 00000cam 2200685Ki 4500 001 on1008960083 003 OCoLC 005 20180329063728.7 006 m d 007 cr n ||| 008 160723t20162016caua ob 000 0 eng d 010 2016429624 020 0833093134|q(paperback) 020 9780833093134|q(paperback) 035 (OCoLC)1008960083 040 VT2|beng|cVT2|dOCLCO|dOCLCF|dOCLCA 043 n-us--- 049 STJJ 082 00 358/.84|223 100 1 McLeod, Gary,|d1948- 245 10 Enhancing space resilience through non-materiel means / |cGary McLeod, George Nacouzi, Paul Dreyer, Mel Eisman, Myron Hura, Krista S. Langeland, David Manheim, Geoffrey Torrington ; prepared for the United States Air Force. 264 1 Santa Monica, California :|bRAND Corporation,|c[2016] 300 1 online resource (xxii, 70 pages :) :|bcolor illustrations. 336 text|btxt|2rdacontent 337 computer|bc|2rdamedia 338 online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 490 1 Research report ;|vRR-1067-AF 500 "RR-1067-AF"--Cover page 4. 500 "RAND Project Air Force" --Title page. 500 GMD: electronic resource. 504 Includes bibliographical references (pages 63-70). 505 00 |tPreface --|tFigures --|tTables --|tSummary -- |tAcknowledgments --|tAbbreviations --|g1.|tIntroduction: |tBackground --|tObjectives --|tScope --|tSpace resilience --|tApproach --|tReport structure --|g2.|tResilience and civil institutions:|tGeneral approaches for building resilient operations:|tImpact avoidance --|tAdaptation and flexibility --|tRecovery and restoration --|tPotential applications to the space operations community --|tSummary --|g3.|tResilience and U.S. government civil space agencies:|tCivil policy considerations:|tFull and open access --|tRapid delivery --|tContinuity of operations -- |tSecurity classification --|tCivil practices: |tInformation --|tOrganization and tactics --|tCommand and control --|tTraining --|tPersonnel --|tSummary --|g4. |tResilience and Air Force space operations:|tOperational concept --|tFindings: information:|tSpace order of battle --|tLimited intelligence at SOPS/SWS --|tSpace knowledge of intelligence personnel --|tSpace Weather effects -- |tSummary --|tFindings: organization and tactics:|tSpace protection lead --|tSpace protection tactics --|tTactics- sharing --|tSummary --|tFindings: command and control: |tSatellite C2 contacts --|tResponsibilities and authorities --|tAnomaly resolution --|tSummary -- |tFindings: training:|tSpace protection training -- |tExercises --|tMultiple satellite C2 systems --|tSummary --|tFindings: personnel:|tInitial qualifications -- |tCareer progression --|tTrained operators --|tSummary -- |tCost of implementation options --|tDetailed recommendations --|g5.|tResilience and a world with international and commercial partners:|tInformation -- |tOrganization and tactics --|tCommand and control --|g6. |tRecommendations:|tOverarching recommendations: |tResilience as a priority --|tSpace protection CONOPS -- |tDetailed recommendations:|tNear-term recommendations -- |tFar-term recommendations --|tROM costs --|gAppendix A: |tSpace resilience cost analysis. 520 "Space is now a congested, contested, and competitive environment. Space systems must become more resilient to potential adversary actions and system failures, but changes to space systems are costly. To provide a complete look at resilience and possibly realize some benefit at lower cost, the Air Force asked RAND to identify non- materiel means--doctrine, organization, training, leadership and education, personnel, facilities, and policy--to enhance space resilience over the near and far terms.The authors developed implementation options to improve resilience based on a notional space protection operational concept: enhancing the capability of space operators to respond, in a timely and effective manner, to adversary counterspace actions. Operators need actionable information, appropriate organization and tactics, and dynamic command and control, supported by appropriate tools and decision aids, relevant training and exercises, and qualified personnel brought into the career field. The authors also recommend that Air Force Space Command develop a formal, end-to-end, space protection concept of operations (CONOPS) that captures all elements needed to improve resilience. In addition, the CONOPS could potentially follow the tenet of centralized control and decentralized execution in certain situations, such as when responding to adversary counterspace actions. For the near-term options, the rough order of magnitude (ROM) nonrecurring engineering (NRE) cost of implementation is estimated to be between $2.5 million and $3.6 million. For the far-term options, the ROM NRE cost is estimated to be between $109 million and $166 million, with the ROM recurring cost between $4 million and $5.4 million per year"--Publisher's description. 590 JSTOR|bBooks at JSTOR Open Access 610 10 United States.|bAir Force|xOperational readiness. 610 17 United States.|bAir Force.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00538280 648 7 2000-2099|2fast 650 0 Astronautics, Military|zUnited States|xHistory|y21st century. 650 0 Space security|xHistory|y21st century. 650 0 Organizational resilience|xHistory|y21st century. 650 7 Armed Forces|xOperational readiness.|2fast |0(OCoLC)fst01351844 650 7 Astronautics, Military.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00819604 650 7 Organizational resilience.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01894854 650 7 Space security.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01747067 651 7 United States.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01204155 655 7 History.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01411628 700 1 Nacouzi, George. 700 1 Dreyer, Paul,|d1973- 700 1 Eisman, Mel,|d1949- 700 1 Hura, Myron,|d1943- 700 1 Langeland, Krista S. 700 1 Manheim, David. 700 1 Torrington, Geoffrey. 710 2 Project Air Force (U.S.) 710 2 Rand Corporation. 830 0 Research report (Rand Corporation) ;|vRR-1067-AF. 914 on1008960083 994 92|bSTJ
|