LEADER 00000cam 2200625Ii 4500
001 ocn948491019
003 OCoLC
005 20180404051553.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 160502t20162016caud ob 000 0 eng d
019 948549906
020 9780833095152|q(electronic bk.)
020 0833095153|q(electronic bk.)
020 |z9780833093134
020 |z0833093134
035 (OCoLC)948491019|z(OCoLC)948549906
037 22573/ctt1btbcz8|bJSTOR
040 DOS|beng|erda|epn|cDOS|dJSTOR|dYDXCP|dOCLCF|dCOO|dVFL
|dOCLCA
049 CKEA
050 4 UG1523|b.M35 2016eb online
082 04 358/.80973|223
100 1 McLeod, Gary,|d1948-|eauthor.
245 10 Enhancing Space Resilience Through Non-Materiel Means /
|cGary McLeod, George Nacouzi, Paul Dreyer, Mel Eisman,
Myron Hura, Krista Langeland, David Manheim.
264 1 Santa Monica, Calif. :|bRAND,|c[2016]
264 4 |c©2016
300 1 online resource (xxii, 70 pages) :|bcolor chart.
336 text|btxt|2rdacontent
337 computer|bc|2rdamedia
338 online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
490 1 Research report ;|vRR-1067-AF
500 "April 28, 2016"--Table of contents page.
504 Includes bibliographical references (pages 63-70).
505 00 |g1.|tIntroduction --|g2.|tResilience and civil
institutions --|g3.|tResilience and U.S. Government civil
space agencies --|g4.|tResilience and Air Force space
operations --|g5.|tResilience and a world with
international and commercial partners --|g6.
|tRecommendations --|gApppendix A.|tSpace resilience cost
analysis.
505 00 |tPreface --|tFigures --|tTables --|tSummary --
|tAcknowledgments --|tAbbreviations --|g1.|tIntroduction:
|tBackground --|tObjectives --|tScope --|tSpace Resilience
--|tApproach --|tReport Structure --|g2.|tResilience and
Civil Institutions:|tGeneral Approaches for Building
Resilient Operations:|tImpact Avoidance --|tAdaptation and
Flexibility --|tRecovery and Restoration --|tPotential
Applications to the Space Operations Community --|tSummary
--|g3.|tResilience and U.S. Government Civil Space
Agencies:|tCivil Policy Considerations:|tFull and Open
Access --|tRapid Delivery --|tContinuity of Operations --
|tSecurity Classification --|tCivil Practices:
|tInformation --|tOrganization and Tactics --|tCommand and
Control --|tTraining --|tPersonnel --|tSummary --|g4.
|tResilience and Air Force Space Operations:|tOperational
Concept --|tFindings: Information:|tSpace Order of Battle
--|tLimited Intelligence at SOPS/SWS --|tSpace Knowledge
of Intelligence Personnel --|tSpace Weather Effects --
|tSummary --|tFindings: Organization and Tactics:|tSpace
Protection Lead --|tSpace Protection Tactics --|tTactics-
Sharing --|tSummary --|tFindings: Command and Control:
|tSatellite C2 Contacts --|tResponsibilities and
Authorities --|tAnomaly Resolution --|tSummary --
|tFindings: Training:|tSpace Protection Training --
|tExercises --|tMultiple Satellite C2 Systems --|tSummary
--|tFindings: Personnel:|tInitial Qualifications --
|tCareer Progression --|tTrained Operators --|tSummary --
|tCost of Implementation Options --|tDetailed
Recommendations --|g5.|tResilience and a World with
International and Commercial Partners:|tInformation --
|tOrganization and Tactics --|tCommand and Control --|g6.
|tRecommendations:|tOverarching Recommendations:
|tResilience as a Priority --|tSpace Protection CONOPS --
|tDetailed Recommendations:|tNear-Term Recommendations --
|tFar-Term Recommendations --|tROM Costs --|gAppendix A:
|tSpace Resilience Cost Analysis --|tReferences.
520 "Space is now a congested, contested, and competitive
environment. Space systems must become more resilient to
potential adversary actions and system failures, but
changes to space systems are costly. To provide a complete
look at resilience and possibly realize some benefit at
lower cost, the Air Force asked RAND to identify non-
materiel means--doctrine, organization, training,
leadership and education, personnel, facilities, and
policy--to enhance space resilience over the near and far
terms.The authors developed implementation options to
improve resilience based on a notional space protection
operational concept: enhancing the capability of space
operators to respond, in a timely and effective manner, to
adversary counterspace actions. Operators need actionable
information, appropriate organization and tactics, and
dynamic command and control, supported by appropriate
tools and decision aids, relevant training and exercises,
and qualified personnel brought into the career field. The
authors also recommend that Air Force Space Command
develop a formal, end-to-end, space protection concept of
operations (CONOPS) that captures all elements needed to
improve resilience. In addition, the CONOPS could
potentially follow the tenet of centralized control and
decentralized execution in certain situations, such as
when responding to adversary counterspace actions. For the
near-term options, the rough order of magnitude (ROM)
nonrecurring engineering (NRE) cost of implementation is
estimated to be between $2.5 million and $3.6 million. For
the far-term options, the ROM NRE cost is estimated to be
between $109 million and $166 million, with the ROM
recurring cost between $4 million and $5.4 million per
year"--Publisher's description.
610 10 United States.|bAir Force|xOperational readiness.
610 17 United States.|bAir Force.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00538280
648 7 2000-2099|2fast
650 0 Astronautics, Military|zUnited States|y21st century.
650 0 Space security|y21st century.
650 0 Organizational resilience|y21st century.
650 7 HISTORY / Military / Aviation.|2bisacsh
650 7 Armed Forces|xOperational readiness.|2fast
|0(OCoLC)fst01351844
650 7 Astronautics, Military.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00819604
650 7 Organizational resilience.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01894854
650 7 Space security.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01747067
651 7 United States.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01204155
655 0 Electronic books.
710 2 Project Air Force (U.S.),|eissuing body,|epublisher.
776 08 |cOriginal|z0833093134|z9780833093134|w(OCoLC)945641740
830 0 Research report (Rand Corporation) ;|vRR-1067-AF.
994 C0|bCKE
