LEADER 00000cam 2200625Ii 4500 001 ocn948491019 003 OCoLC 005 20180404051553.0 006 m o d 007 cr ||||||||||| 008 160502t20162016caud ob 000 0 eng d 019 948549906 020 9780833095152|q(electronic bk.) 020 0833095153|q(electronic bk.) 020 |z9780833093134 020 |z0833093134 035 (OCoLC)948491019|z(OCoLC)948549906 037 22573/ctt1btbcz8|bJSTOR 040 DOS|beng|erda|epn|cDOS|dJSTOR|dYDXCP|dOCLCF|dCOO|dVFL |dOCLCA 049 CKEA 050 4 UG1523|b.M35 2016eb online 082 04 358/.80973|223 100 1 McLeod, Gary,|d1948-|eauthor. 245 10 Enhancing Space Resilience Through Non-Materiel Means / |cGary McLeod, George Nacouzi, Paul Dreyer, Mel Eisman, Myron Hura, Krista Langeland, David Manheim. 264 1 Santa Monica, Calif. :|bRAND,|c[2016] 264 4 |c©2016 300 1 online resource (xxii, 70 pages) :|bcolor chart. 336 text|btxt|2rdacontent 337 computer|bc|2rdamedia 338 online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 490 1 Research report ;|vRR-1067-AF 500 "April 28, 2016"--Table of contents page. 504 Includes bibliographical references (pages 63-70). 505 00 |g1.|tIntroduction --|g2.|tResilience and civil institutions --|g3.|tResilience and U.S. Government civil space agencies --|g4.|tResilience and Air Force space operations --|g5.|tResilience and a world with international and commercial partners --|g6. |tRecommendations --|gApppendix A.|tSpace resilience cost analysis. 505 00 |tPreface --|tFigures --|tTables --|tSummary -- |tAcknowledgments --|tAbbreviations --|g1.|tIntroduction: |tBackground --|tObjectives --|tScope --|tSpace Resilience --|tApproach --|tReport Structure --|g2.|tResilience and Civil Institutions:|tGeneral Approaches for Building Resilient Operations:|tImpact Avoidance --|tAdaptation and Flexibility --|tRecovery and Restoration --|tPotential Applications to the Space Operations Community --|tSummary --|g3.|tResilience and U.S. Government Civil Space Agencies:|tCivil Policy Considerations:|tFull and Open Access --|tRapid Delivery --|tContinuity of Operations -- |tSecurity Classification --|tCivil Practices: |tInformation --|tOrganization and Tactics --|tCommand and Control --|tTraining --|tPersonnel --|tSummary --|g4. |tResilience and Air Force Space Operations:|tOperational Concept --|tFindings: Information:|tSpace Order of Battle --|tLimited Intelligence at SOPS/SWS --|tSpace Knowledge of Intelligence Personnel --|tSpace Weather Effects -- |tSummary --|tFindings: Organization and Tactics:|tSpace Protection Lead --|tSpace Protection Tactics --|tTactics- Sharing --|tSummary --|tFindings: Command and Control: |tSatellite C2 Contacts --|tResponsibilities and Authorities --|tAnomaly Resolution --|tSummary -- |tFindings: Training:|tSpace Protection Training -- |tExercises --|tMultiple Satellite C2 Systems --|tSummary --|tFindings: Personnel:|tInitial Qualifications -- |tCareer Progression --|tTrained Operators --|tSummary -- |tCost of Implementation Options --|tDetailed Recommendations --|g5.|tResilience and a World with International and Commercial Partners:|tInformation -- |tOrganization and Tactics --|tCommand and Control --|g6. |tRecommendations:|tOverarching Recommendations: |tResilience as a Priority --|tSpace Protection CONOPS -- |tDetailed Recommendations:|tNear-Term Recommendations -- |tFar-Term Recommendations --|tROM Costs --|gAppendix A: |tSpace Resilience Cost Analysis --|tReferences. 520 "Space is now a congested, contested, and competitive environment. Space systems must become more resilient to potential adversary actions and system failures, but changes to space systems are costly. To provide a complete look at resilience and possibly realize some benefit at lower cost, the Air Force asked RAND to identify non- materiel means--doctrine, organization, training, leadership and education, personnel, facilities, and policy--to enhance space resilience over the near and far terms.The authors developed implementation options to improve resilience based on a notional space protection operational concept: enhancing the capability of space operators to respond, in a timely and effective manner, to adversary counterspace actions. Operators need actionable information, appropriate organization and tactics, and dynamic command and control, supported by appropriate tools and decision aids, relevant training and exercises, and qualified personnel brought into the career field. The authors also recommend that Air Force Space Command develop a formal, end-to-end, space protection concept of operations (CONOPS) that captures all elements needed to improve resilience. In addition, the CONOPS could potentially follow the tenet of centralized control and decentralized execution in certain situations, such as when responding to adversary counterspace actions. For the near-term options, the rough order of magnitude (ROM) nonrecurring engineering (NRE) cost of implementation is estimated to be between $2.5 million and $3.6 million. For the far-term options, the ROM NRE cost is estimated to be between $109 million and $166 million, with the ROM recurring cost between $4 million and $5.4 million per year"--Publisher's description. 610 10 United States.|bAir Force|xOperational readiness. 610 17 United States.|bAir Force.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00538280 648 7 2000-2099|2fast 650 0 Astronautics, Military|zUnited States|y21st century. 650 0 Space security|y21st century. 650 0 Organizational resilience|y21st century. 650 7 HISTORY / Military / Aviation.|2bisacsh 650 7 Armed Forces|xOperational readiness.|2fast |0(OCoLC)fst01351844 650 7 Astronautics, Military.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00819604 650 7 Organizational resilience.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01894854 650 7 Space security.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01747067 651 7 United States.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01204155 655 0 Electronic books. 710 2 Project Air Force (U.S.),|eissuing body,|epublisher. 776 08 |cOriginal|z0833093134|z9780833093134|w(OCoLC)945641740 830 0 Research report (Rand Corporation) ;|vRR-1067-AF. 994 C0|bCKE
|