LEADER 00000cam 2200481Ki 4500
001 ocn969639929
003 OCoLC
005 20180621034108.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|---|||||
008 170121s2017 gw o 000 0 eng d
019 968508255
020 9783658169268
020 3658169265
020 |z3658169257
020 |z9783658169251
035 (OCoLC)969639929|z(OCoLC)968508255
040 EBLCP|beng|erda|epn|cEBLCP|dOCLCO|dYDX|dUAB|dOCLCQ|dSTF
|dIOG|dJG0|dIAD|dJBG|dICW|dESU|dILO|dMERER|dOCLCQ|dICN
|dOTZ|dIAS|dIDB|dU3W|dMERUC|dGBVCP|dOCLCQ|dCAUOI|dOCLCQ
|dOH1|dSTJ
049 STJJ
050 4 GV1201.37
050 4 BF1-990
082 04 150
099 WORLD WIDE WEB|aE-BOOK|aSPRINGER
100 1 Brühlmann, Florian,|eauthor.
245 14 The effects of framing in gamification :|ba study of
failure /|cFlorian Brühlmann ; Mit einem Geleitwort von
Prof. Dr. Klaus Opwis und Dr. Elisa Mekler.
264 1 Wiesbaden :|bSpringer Fachmedien Wiesbaden,|c[2016]
300 1 online resource (77 pages).
336 text|btxt|2rdacontent
337 computer|bc|2rdamedia
338 online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
490 1 BestMasters
520 The author shows that - contradicting the findings of
Lieberoth (2015) - simply framing an activity as a game
does not increase intrinsic motivation of the participants
in a difficult puzzle task. Moreover, for participants who
failed at the puzzle, it does not make any difference in
terms of intrinsic motivation whether it was framed as a
task, a meaningful task, a game or a test of cognitive
abilities. However, perceived value of the activity and
satisfaction of the need for autonomy were identified as
significant predictors for completing additional rounds of
the task. This lends support for the importance of the
voluntariness and meaningfulness of the task to keep
people engaged in gamification.
588 0 Print version record.
650 0 Motivation (Psychology)|xMethodology.
650 0 Gamification.
650 0 Cognitive psychology.
655 0 Electronic books.
776 08 |iPrint version:|aBrühlmann, Florian.|tEffects of Framing
in Gamification : A Study of Failure.|dWiesbaden :
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, ©2017|z9783658169251
830 0 BestMasters.
994 C0|bSTJ
