Skip to content
You are not logged in |Login  
     
Limit search to available items
Bestseller
BestsellerE-Book
Author Timms, Michael.

Title Aligning Science Standards Arkansas and the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Issues & Answers. REL 2007-No. 019 / Michael Timms, Steven Schneider and Cindy Lee.

Imprint [Place of publication not identified] Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 2007.

Copies

Location Call No. Status
 University of Saint Joseph: Pope Pius XII Library - Internet  WORLD WIDE WEB E-BOOK EBSCO    Downloadable
Please click here to access this EBSCO resource
Description 1 online resource (61 pages)
Note Availability: Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Available from: Edvance Research. 9901 IH-10 West Suite 700, San Antonio, TX 78230. Tel: 877-338-2623; Fax: 210-558-4183; e-mail: tassistance@edvanceresearch.com; Web site: http://edlabs.ed.gov/RELSouthwest. ericd
Abstractor: ERIC. ericd
Educational level discussed: Elementary Secondary Education.
Educational level discussed: Grade 12.
Educational level discussed: Grade 4.
Educational level discussed: Grade 5.
Educational level discussed: Grade 7.
Educational level discussed: Grade 8.
Summary This policy research document is intended for Arkansas policymakers to use when examining possible changes to the Arkansas state assessment's alignment with the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The 2009 NAEP test is not yet in existence, so the purpose of this report is to give policymakers a head start in determining where they might, if they so decide, begin to make changes in their assessment standards and create test specifications to develop an assessment system more closely aligned with that used for the NAEP. This report reveals alignment issues between the state's tests and future NAEP tests and may be important to those considering revising their science standards and assessments in line with No Child Left Behind requirements for state science tests in elementary, middle, and high schools. Revising assessments requires considerable time and resources, so policymakers must consider their capacity for making changes and the degree to which such changes will benefit students. The analysis uses the Arkansas Science Curriculum Frameworks for grades K-8 and for biology. The NAEP is administered to students in grades 4, 8, and 12, but Arkansas conducts statewide tests in grade 5, grade 7, and biology. Since the Arkansas standards for grade 5, grade 7, and biology were most likely to appear on state assessments, they were used to compare Arkansas standards with the NAEP standards. This study was designed to compare the NAEP and a corresponding state assessment framework. However, science specialists in Arkansas indicated that their statewide exams draw from the entire set of standards within the Science Curriculum Frameworks and thus this alignment was performed with the NAEP, which is an "assessment framework," and the Arkansas Science Curriculum Frameworks, which are designed to indicate what science should be taught at various grade levels. Standards and test specifications are the starting point for developing tests and test items. In the ideal alignment study state science assessments would be directly compared with NAEP assessments at the item level. The NAEP 2009 assessment items may someday be available for such a study. Since the purpose of this report is to allow policymakers to examine their alignment with NAEP before the test is implemented, no further research is suggested. The following are appended: (1) The documents compared; (2) How the study was conducted; (3) Content alignment table for grade 4; (4) Content alignment for grade 8; and (5) Content alignment for grade 12. (Contains 1 box, 3 figures, and 12 tables.) [This report was prepared for the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education by Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest, formerly known as Southwest Regional Educational Laboratory (SEDL), administered by Edvance Research, Inc.].
Audience Policymakers. ericd.
Cite As: Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. ericd
Local Note EBSCOhost Education Research Complete
Subject Science Tests.
National Competency Tests.
National Standards.
State Standards.
Academic Standards.
Elementary Secondary Education.
Science Education.
Science Curriculum.
Student Evaluation.
Federal Legislation.
Test Items.
Testing.
Benchmarking.
Grade 4.
Grade 8.
Grade 12.
Grade 5.
Grade 7.
Biology.
Genre/Form Reports, Research.
Added Author Schneider, Steven, author.
Lee, Cindy, author.
Rolfhus, Eric, author.
Institute of Education Sciences (ED), Washington, DC.
-->
Add a Review