LEADER 00000cam  2200517 a 4500 
001    ocm30029772  
003    OCoLC 
005    20150904101251.0 
008    940222s1994    ohu      b    001 0 eng   
010       94006912 
020    0829810013|q(alkaline paper) 
020    9780829810011|q(alkaline paper) 
035    (OCoLC)30029772 
040    DLC|beng|cDLC|dBAKER|dBTCTA|dYDXCP|dOCLCG|dGEBAY|dNHI|dBDX
       |dOCLCO|dOCLCF|dAUW|dOCLCQ|dOCLCO|dDEBBG|dOCLCO|dSTJ 
049    STJJ 
050 00 BJ1725|b.W45 1994 
082 00 174|220 
084    QC 010|2rvk 
092    174|bW439C 
100 1  Welch, Don,|d1947- 
245 10 Conflicting agendas :|bpersonal morality in institutional 
       settings /|cD. Don Welch. 
264  1 Cleveland, Ohio :|bPilgrim Press,|c1994. 
300    195 pages ;|c21 cm 
336    text|btxt|2rdacontent 
337    unmediated|bn|2rdamedia 
338    volume|bnc|2rdacarrier 
504    Includes bibliographical references (pages 185-190) and 
       index. 
505 0  1. Agendas -- 2. Agendas and ethical reflection -- 3, The 
       institutional context -- 4. The hermit -- 5. The 
       institutionalized person -- 6. The split personality -- 7.
       The reformer -- 8. The accommodator -- 9. The convert -- 
       10. The response ethic of a social self -- 11. Making the 
       appropriate response -- Conclusion: Agendas and personal 
       integrity. 
520 1  "All of us make decisions and act on those decisions as 
       individuals - but we also do the same as parts of larger 
       groups, whether in a work, family neighborhood, club, 
       church, or other institutional setting. Those two, 
       sometimes differing, decision-making settings can place us
       in extremely awkward positions. How should we behave when 
       our personal morality conflicts with our role in a 
       particular institution or when our personal "agenda" is 
       not consistent with the "agenda" of the larger groups? Don
       Welch asserts that it is impossible to separate ourselves 
       as social beings from the institutions of which we are a 
       part. Using real-life examples and buildings his arguments
       from elements as diverse as H. Richard Niebuhr and 
       Doonesbury, Welch defines the various roles of "agenda" 
       and how various personalities react and respond to 
       personal as well as corporate agendas." "Welch introduces 
       us to the "Hermit," to the "Institutionalized Person," to 
       the "Split Personality," to the "Reformer," to the 
       "Accommodator," and to the "Convert"--Among whom we 
       discover aspects of ourselves. Finally, Welch maintains 
       that an appropriate response to the institution involves 
       an ethic of "responsibility," one that does not simply 
       abide by rules or calculate consequences to determine 
       behavior, but one that integrates the constancy of one's 
       own personal integrity with concern for the larger group."
       --Jacket. 
650  0 Professional ethics. 
650  0 Corporate culture. 
650  0 Individualism. 
650  0 Decision making|xMoral and ethical aspects. 
650  0 Organizational behavior|xMoral and ethical aspects. 
650  7 Corporate culture.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00879624 
650  7 Decision making|xMoral and ethical aspects.|2fast
       |0(OCoLC)fst00889052 
650  7 Individualism.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00970328 
650  7 Organizational behavior|xMoral and ethical aspects.|2fast
       |0(OCoLC)fst01047811 
650  7 Professional ethics.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01078521 
650 07 Berufsethik.|2swd 
650 07 Berufsethik.|0(DE-588)4253135-4|2gnd 
776 08 |iOnline version:|aWelch, Don, 1947-|tConflicting agendas.
       |dCleveland, Ohio : Pilgrim Press, 1994|w(OCoLC)624377828 
776 08 |iOnline version:|aWelch, Don, 1947-|tConflicting agendas.
       |dCleveland, Ohio : Pilgrim Press, 1994|w(OCoLC)632058184 
994    01|bSTJ