LEADER 00000cam  2200481Ki 4500 
001    on1147257264 
003    OCoLC 
005    20200525061942.9 
006    m     o  d         
007    cu uuu---auuuu 
008    200310s2020    enk     o     000 u eng d 
024 7  10.5334/bci|2doi 
035    (OCoLC)1147257264 
040    SFB|beng|erda|cSFB|dOCLCQ 
049    CKEA 
072  7 GPQD|2bicssc 
072  7 KFFD|2bicssc 
072  7 PD|2bicssc 
072  7 PS|2bicssc 
072  7 TBC|2bicssc 
072  7 YNT|2bicssc 
100 1  Rozell, Daniel J.|4aut,|eauthor. 
245 10 Dangerous Science. 
264  1 London|bUbiquity Press|c2020. 
300    1 online resource (162) 
336    text|btxt|2rdacontent 
337    computer|bc|2rdamedia 
338    online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 
347    data file|2rda 
520    The public is generally enthusiastic about the latest 
       science and technology, but sometimes research threatens 
       the physical safety or ethical norms of society. When this
       happens, scientists and engineers can find themselves 
       unprepared in the midst of an intense science policy 
       debate. In the absence of convincing evidence, 
       technological optimists and skeptics struggle to build 
       consensus. In these situations, it is best to sidestep the
       instigating controversy by using a broad risk-benefit 
       assessment as a risk exploration tool to help scientists 
       and engineers accomplish their goals while avoiding 
       physical or moral dangers. Dangerous Science explores the 
       intersection of science policy and risk analysis to 
       determine ways to minimize negative impacts of science and
       technology on society.? 
546    English. 
650  7 Risk assessment.|2bicssc 
650  7 Public finance.|2bicssc 
650  7 Science: general issues.|2bicssc 
650  7 Biology, life sciences.|2bicssc 
650  7 Engineering: general.|2bicssc 
650  7 Science & technology: general interest (Children's
       |xTeenage)|2bicssc 
776 0  |z1911529897 
914    on1147257264 
994    92|bCKE