| Description |
1 online resource (159 pages) |
| Note |
"RAND Corporation." |
|
"This research was prepared for the Los Angeles County Probation Department and conducted in the Safety and Justice Program within RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment." |
|
Title from title screen (viewed July 31, 2013). |
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references. |
| Contents |
Background and Methodology -- Current JJCPA Programs and FY 2011-2012 Outcome Measures -- Juvenile Justice Costs for JJCPA Participants -- Summary and Conclusions -- Appendix A: Community Providers of JJCPA Program Services -- Appendix B: Comparison Groups and Reference Periods for JJCPA Programs -- Appendix C: Probation's Ranking of the Big Six Outcome Measures -- Appendix D: Community-Based Organizations That Contracted to Provide Services for JJCPA Programs in FY 2011-2012 -- Appendix E: Board of State and Community Corrections-Mandated and Supplemental Outcomes for Individual JJCPA Programs, FY 2011-2012 -- Appendix F: Board of State and Community Corrections-Mandated Outcomes, by Gender -- Appendix G: Board of State and Community Corrections-Mandated Outcomes, by Cluster. |
| Summary |
Californiá⁰₉s Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act was designed to provide a stable funding source for juvenile programs that have been proven effective in curbing crime among at-risk and young offenders. It provides funds to counties to add evidence-based programs and services for juvenile probationers identified with higher needs for special services than those identified for routine probationers, at-risk youth who have not entered the probation system but who live or attend school in areas of high crime or who have other factors that potentially predispose them to criminal activities, and youth in juvenile halls and camps. The Board of State and Community Corrections is required to submit annual reports to the California state legislature measuring the programС́⁰₉s success for six outcome measures: (1) successful completion of probation, (2) arrests, (3) probation violations, (4) incarcerations, (5) successful completion of restitution, and (6) successful completion of community service. Each county can also measure supplemental outcomes. For the six state-mandated outcomes, differences between program participants and comparison-group youth are mostly positive, though relatively small. County-developed supplemental outcomes, which measure performance of program participants at program entry and again at a later time, tend to be more favorable. |
| Note |
Online resource. |
| Subject |
Juvenile delinquency -- California -- Los Angeles -- Prevention.
|
|
Juvenile justice, Administration of -- California -- Los Angeles County.
|
|
Juvenile probation -- California -- Los Angeles.
|
|
Juvenile delinquency -- Prevention.
(OCoLC)fst00985335
|
|
Juvenile justice, Administration of. (OCoLC)fst00985472
|
|
Juvenile probation. (OCoLC)fst00985504
|
|
California -- Los Angeles.
(OCoLC)fst01204540
|
|
California -- Los Angeles County.
(OCoLC)fst01205194
|
| Genre/Form |
Electronic books.
|
| Added Author |
Turner, Susan, 1954- author.
|
|
Greathouse, Sarah Michal, author.
|
|
Rand Corporation.
|
|
Rand Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment (Organization). Safety and Justice Program.
|
|
Los Angeles County (Calif.). Probation Department.
|
| ISBN |
9780833083715 (electronic bk.) |
|
0833083716 (electronic bk.) |
| Report No. |
RAND/RR-268-LACPD |
|
