LEADER 00000cam  2200493K  4500 
001    ocn562594472 
003    OCoLC 
005    20160422031056.0 
006    m     o  d         
007    cr bn||||||abp 
007    cr bn||||||ada 
008    100318s1952    ncua    o     000 0 eng d 
035    (OCoLC)562594472 
040    OCLCE|beng|epn|cOCLCE|dOCLCQ|dOCLCA|dOCLCQ|dOCLCO|dOCLCF
       |dOTZ|dSTJ 
042    dlr 
049    STJJ 
050  4 BF441|b.W64 
082 04 153.68 
099    WORLD WIDE WEB|aE-BOOK|aEBSCO 
100 1  Adkins, Dorothy C.|q(Dorothy Christina),|d1912-1975. 
245 10 Factor analysis of reasoning tests /|cby Dorothy C. Adkins
       and Samuel B. Lyerly, with the assistance of Goldie Demb 
       and Daniel W. Campbell. 
264  1 Chapel Hill :|bUniversity of North Carolina Press,|c1952. 
300    1 online resource (iv, 122 leaves) :|billustrations 
336    text|btxt|2rdacontent 
337    computer|bc|2rdamedia 
338    online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 
500    GMD: electronic resource. 
505 0  Part I. Preliminary factor analysis of 38 Air Force tests 
       -- part II. Factor analysis of a 66-variable battery -- 
       part III. Summary and conclusions. 
506    |3Use copy|fRestrictions unspecified|2star|5MiAaHDL 
520    "This project was undertaken in an attempt to clarify the 
       underlying nature of the abilities affecting performance 
       in types of tests that have been identified previously or 
       suggested as measures of reasoning. The project staff 
       devoted a considerable amount of time during the early 
       months of the study to readings and discussions on 
       reasoning, including both the psychological and the 
       philosophical literature. We were impressed with the great
       variety of definitions, points of view, and criteria 
       adopted or entertained by the various authors. Reasoning, 
       like many other psychological phenomena, may be approached
       at different levels and with different degrees of analytic
       or descriptive completeness, depending upon the purpose 
       and the theoretical orientation of the writer. We did not 
       attempt to frame a definition of reasoning, but we did 
       gather descriptions of reasoning behavior from various 
       sources and descriptions of situations in which behavior 
       considered to be reasoning is said to occur. We then 
       attempted to select or construct one or more tests each of
       which required one or more of the kind of behavior that 
       had been encountered"--Introduction. (PsycINFO Database 
       Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved). 
533    Electronic reproduction.|b[S.l.] :|cHathiTrust Digital 
       Library,|d2010.|5MiAaHDL 
538    Master and use copy. Digital master created according to 
       Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs
       and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, 
       December 2002.|uhttp://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212
       |5MiAaHDL 
583 1  digitized|c2010|hHathiTrust Digital Library|lcommitted to 
       preserve|2pda|5MiAaHDL 
588    Description based on print version record. 
650  0 Reasoning (Psychology)|xTesting. 
650  0 Factor analysis. 
650  7 Factor analysis.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01432040 
650  7 Reasoning (Psychology)|xTesting.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01091301
700 1  Lyerly, Samuel B.,|eauthor. 
776 08 |iPrint version:|aAdkins, Dorothy Christina, 1912-|tFactor
       analysis of reasoning tests.|dChapel Hill, University of 
       North Carolina Press, 1952|w(DLC)   52000765
       |w(OCoLC)203989 
994    C0|bSTJ