LEADER 00000cam 2200529Mi 4500 001 on1167466642 003 OCoLC 005 20230428213021.0 006 m d 007 cu uuu|||auuuu 008 200123s2015 nyu o 000 u eng d 019 1164870321|a1180623216 024 7 10.21983/P3.0124.1.00.|2doi 035 (OCoLC)1167466642|z(OCoLC)1164870321|z(OCoLC)1180623216 037 22573/cats2329894|bJSTOR 040 LUN|beng|erda|cLUN|dHS0|dOCLCO|dOCLCF|dOCLCO|dOCLCQ|dJSTOR 049 CKEA 050 4 HQ75.15|b.K46 2015 082 04 306.76/6|223 100 1 Kemp, Jonathan.|4aut 245 10 Homotopia?: Gay Identity, Sameness & the Politics of Desire. 246 3 Homotopia? 264 1 Brooklyn, NY :|bpunctum books,|c2015. 300 1 online resource (154) 336 text|btxt|2rdacontent 337 computer|bc|2rdamedia 338 other|bcz|2rdacarrier 347 data file|2rda 505 0 Introduction. Refusals -- Against custom : Andre Gide's pedagogic pederasty -- No such things as homosexuals : Marcel Proust and 'la race maudite' -- Beautiful flowers and perverse ruins : Edward Carpenter's Intermediate sex - - A problem in gay heroics : John Addington Symonds and l'amour de l'impossible -- Conclusion. Fear of a gay anus. 520 Do opposites attract? Is desire lack? These assumptions have become so much a part of the ways in which we conceive desire that they are rarely questioned. Yet, what do they say about how homosexuality -- a desire for the same -- is viewed in our culture? This book takes as its starting point the absence of a suitable theory of homosexual desire, a theory not predicated on such heterological assumptions. It is an investigation into how such assumptions acquired meaning within homosexual discourse, and as such is offered as an interruption within the hegemony of desire. As such, homosexual desire constitutes the biggest challenge to Western binaric thinking in that it dissolves the sacred distinctions between Same/Other, Desire/Identification, subject/object, male/female. Homotopia? (composed in 1997 but not published until now) investigates the development of a homosexual discourse at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century, and reveals how that discourse worked within heterosexualized models of desire. Andre Gide's Corydon, Edward Carpenter's The Intermediate Sex, and John Addington Symond's A Problem in Modern Ethics are all pseudo-scientific texts written by non-medical men of letters, and were, in their time, highly influential on the emerging homosexual discourse. The fourth text, the twenty-odd pages of Marcel Proust's novel A la recherché de temps perdu usually referred to as 'La Race maudite,' is the most problematic, in that it appeared under the guise of fiction. But Proust originally planned this 'essay-within-a-novel' to be published separately. In it, he offers a pseudo-scientific theory of male-male love. These four texts were published between the years 1891 and 1924, an historical moment when the concept of a distinct homosexual identity took shape within a medicalized discourse centered on essential identity traits and characteristics, and they all work within the rubric of science, contributing to a discourse which saw the human race divided into two distinct categories: heterosexuals and homosexuals. How did this division come about, and what were its effects? How was this discourse sustained, and how were the meanings it produced received? For men whose erotic interest was exclusively in other men, what did it mean to see oneself and one's desires as the outcome of biology rather than moral lapse? 546 English. 650 0 Gay men|xSocial life and customs. 650 0 Homosexuality. 650 2 Homosexuality 650 7 homosexuality.|2aat 650 7 Gay & Lesbian studies.|2bicssc 650 7 Gay men|xSocial life and customs.|2fast |0(OCoLC)fst00939152 650 7 Homosexuality.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00959755 650 7 SOCIAL SCIENCE / Gay Studies|2bisacsh 776 08 |iPrint version:|z0692606246 914 on1167466642 994 92|bCKE 998 |bBooks at JSTOR Open Access
|