LEADER 00000cam  2200613Ii 4500 
001    ocn956758848 
003    OCoLC 
005    20200419054825.6 
006    m     o  d         
007    cr nn|008mamaa 
008    160728t20162016enka    ob    000 0 eng d 
020    9783319425054|q(eBook) 
020    3319425056|q(eBook) 
020    |z9783319425047 
024 7  10.1007/978-3-319-42505-4|2doi 
035    (OCoLC)956758848 
040    AZU|beng|erda|epn|cAZU|dOCLCO|dDOS|dOCLCO|dUIU|dUAB|dIOG
       |dZ5A|dOTZ|dVLB|dOCL|dU3W|dOCLCQ|dKSU|dOCLCA|dAUD|dOL$
       |dOCLCQ|dGW5XE|dOCL 
043    e------ 
049    STJJ 
050  4 KJE6044|b.C377 2016eb 
082 04 342.8204|223 
100 1  Carrera, Sergio|c(Political scientist),|eauthor. 
245 10 Implementation of EU readmission agreements :|bidentity 
       determination dilemmas and the blurring of rights /
       |cSergio Carrera. 
264  1 [London, England] :|bSpringerOpen,|c[2016] 
264  4 |c©2016 
300    1 online resource (xvii, 83 pages) :|billustrations (some 
       color). 
336    text|btxt|2rdacontent 
337    computer|bc|2rdamedia 
338    online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 
490 1  SpringerBriefs in Law,|x2192-8568 
500    "Open Access. This book is distributed under the terms of 
       the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
       (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which 
       permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and 
       reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give 
       appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the 
       source, a link is provided to the Creative Commons license
       and any changes made are indicated."--Title page verso. 
504    Includes bibliographical references. 
505 00 |g1.|tIntroduction --|g2.|tThe EU and the Ineffectiveness 
       of Expulsion Policies --|g3.|tIdentity Determination 
       Dilemmas: Whose National Are You? --|g3.1.|tThe Quasi-
       suspension of the EURA with Pakistan --|g3.2.|tPham v. 
       Secretary of State for the Home Department Case --|g4.
       |tEURAs Compared --|g4.1.|tReadmission Obligation of Own 
       Nationals --|g4.2.|tReadmission Procedures: Principles and
       Means of Evidence --|g4.2.1.|tPrinciples --|g4.2.2.|tMeans
       of Evidence of Nationality --|g4.2.3.|tApplication and 
       Implementation --|g5.|tThe Implementation Challenges and 
       Dynamics of EURAs --|g5.1.|tLack of Accountability and 
       Transparency --|g5.2.|tThe Value Added of Formal and 
       Informal EU Readmission Instruments --|g5.3.|tInter-state 
       and Inter-actor Challenges: Re-modelling the Boundaries of
       Authority --|g5.4.|tThe Blurring of Rights --|g6.
       |tConclusions --|gAnnex. 
506    Open access.|5GW5XE 
520    By examining the implementation dynamics of EU Readmission
       Agreements (EURAs), this book addresses the practical 
       reasons why irregular immigrants cannot be expelled. EURAs
       are one of the vital legal instruments framing EU external
       migration law with regard to the expulsion of irregular 
       immigrants, yet their implementation has met with various 
       obstacles. Above all, the process of determining an 
       individual's legal identity has proven to be one of the 
       most controversial aspects in the implementation of EURAs.
       The analysis shows that the process of identifying who is 
       whose national in the context of readmission creates two 
       existential dilemmas: first from the perspective of the 
       sovereignty of third countries of origin and the legal 
       standards laid out in international instruments as regards
       states' powers in determining nationality, and second 
       regarding the agency of the individual as a holder of 
       fundamental human rights. How do the EURAs deal with or 
       aim at alleviating these identity determination dilemmas? 
       The book provides a comparative analysis of the 
       administrative procedures and rules envisaged by EURAs 
       aimed at proving or presuming the nationality of the 
       persons to be readmitted to their country of origin. It 
       focuses on the ways in which nationality is to be 
       determined or presumed in the scope of the 2010 EURA with 
       Pakistan, and compares it with those foreseen in the EURAs
       with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cape Verde, Georgia, and Turkey.
       As such, the book provides a unique and up-to-date study 
       of EURAs and their implementation challenges in the 
       broader context of EU external migration law and policy. 
588 0  Online resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerOpen, 
       viewed August 31, 2016). 
590    SpringerLink|bSpringer Nature Open Access eBooks 
650  0 Emigration and immigration law|zEuropean Union countries. 
650  0 Freedom of movement|zEuropean Union countries. 
650  0 Human rights|zEuropean Union countries. 
650  0 Humanitarian law|zEuropean Union countries. 
650  7 Emigration and immigration.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00908690 
650  7 Emigration and immigration law.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00908736 
650  7 Freedom of movement.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00934026 
650  7 Human rights.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00963285 
650  7 Humanitarian law.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00963577 
651  0 European Union countries|xEmigration and immigration. 
651  7 European Union countries.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01269470 
776 08 |iPrint version:|z9783319425047 
830  0 SpringerBriefs in law.|x2192-8568 
914    ocn956758848 
994    92|bSTJ